Too Big For “Bad Boy” Sanctions?

The SEC Commissioners are struggling over whether a big money center bank can be “too big to be a bad actor.”

Bloomberg reports that the Democratic-appointed Commissioners are arguing that Bank of America should not get a “bad boy” waiver as a part of its negotiated toxic mortgage settlement. Without the waiver, BOA could not offer private placements to its clients. Commissioner Stein has said in the past that banks need to know that there are consequences to bad behavior.

Proponents of the waivers say that it is a blunt instrument meant for egregious frauds perpetrated by small time operators, not established financial institutions where it would penalize innocent customers.

Bloomberg surmises that with the Chairman recusing herself, it’s possible that BOA may not get all of the waivers it seeks.

About JeffKoeppel

I am a corporate/securities attorney in the Washington, DC area. Prior to joining the firm, I was a Senior Attorney Advisor in the Division of Corporation Finance at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. I am a member of the Bars of the States of Maryland, New York and the District of Columbia. You can also follow this blog on LinkedIn at:
This entry was posted in Congress, Crowd Fund Act, Crowd Fund Act of 2012, Crowd Funding At the Margins, Crowd Funding Platforms, FINRA, Funding Portals, Investments, Jobs, Legislative Intent, SEC, Wall Street and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.