You Believe Me, Don’t You?

The regulatory trade-off made by the SEC in permitting issuers to advertise a private placement was to have them take reasonable steps to verify that the purchasers are, in fact, “accredited investors.”

In today’s Wall Street Journal, an op-ed writer suggests that making angels prove that they are actually accredited will chill their passion for investing in the hot new startup.

This commentator believes that self certification is sufficient (it will still be available for non-advertised offerings). But the loud protest almost makes it appear that self certification is just a wink and nod at compliance and that many angels, if tested, might not really have the income or net worth to qualify.

If there are numbers out there that can prove this one way or the other, I’d like to see them.

About JeffKoeppel

I am a corporate/securities attorney in the Washington, DC area. Prior to joining the firm, I was a Senior Attorney Advisor in the Division of Corporation Finance at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. I am a member of the Bars of the States of Maryland, New York and the District of Columbia. You can also follow this blog on LinkedIn at:
This entry was posted in Congress, Crowd Fund Act, Crowd Fund Act of 2012, Crowd Funding At the Margins, Crowd Funding Platforms, Film, FINRA, Funding Portals, Investments, Legislative Intent, SEC, Small Business, Wall Street and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.